A board that is asked to demonstrate what the company falls under often discovers that the sector has never been formally recorded. There is a sense of what the company does, something is stated in the articles of association, and there is a code with the Chamber of Commerce. That is not automatically the same sector that counts for the obligations that apply. Sector is one of the factors that partly determine which regime applies, alongside for instance size and legal form, and a record that holds up afterward requires more than an assumption that was never written down.
Many obligations are not the same for everyone. Certain sectors have additional rules, others have exceptions, and sometimes the threshold at which an obligation starts to apply shifts upward or downward depending on the sector in which a company is active. Anyone serving the financial sector, the energy sector or another regulated sector may face rules that do not affect a company in a different sector. That makes sector not a side issue in the file, but one of the first questions that must be answered and that must remain answered at the moment someone asks about it.
Recording is not filling in a code with the Chamber of Commerce and being done with it. That code is an indication, not a legal determination. Recording is also not an internal assumption that was never written down, however logical that assumption may feel to someone who has known the company for years. What does count: a document stating which sector or sectors have been declared applicable, on the basis of which activities, by whom that determination was made and when. Without those four elements there is an opinion, not a record.
The determination of the sector should have an owner: someone who is responsible for the accuracy of that determination and who can be held accountable if the determination later turns out to be incorrect. Often this is the General Counsel or a comparable role, but the title matters less than the question of whether that owner can be identified. In addition, there must be evidence: not just the conclusion, but the substantiation on which that conclusion rests. Which revenue streams were included, which activities were excluded, and on the basis of which definition was the sector determined. Anyone who cannot show that evidence cannot demonstrate the conclusion, even if the conclusion itself is correct.
A company that changes activity, adds a new line of business or divests part of its activities may, as a result, also change sector for the purposes of certain obligations. That affects not only the question of which rules apply, but also whether earlier determinations still hold. A control that was set up based on the old sector classification may no longer align with the actual obligations after a change. That is one of the moments at which a file that once was correct stops being correct without anyone noticing. A record that shows only the outcome and not the moment of determination does not show whether that outcome is still current.
Sector does not operate in isolation. The question of which obligations apply also depends on the size of the company, on the legal form in which the company is organized and on the countries in which the company is active, because a sector that has an additional regime in one country may fall under the ordinary rules in another country. The product or service offered can also influence the sector classification, as described under the recording of the product. The fact that national gold-plating causes the same European rule to play out differently applies to sector just as much as to the other factors: a sector classification that was worked out for one country cannot be carried over without verification to another country in which the company is active.
The determination of the sector is often made somewhere, by someone, at a certain moment, and then disappears into an email, a project document or the memory of someone who no longer works at the company. How that happens and what can be done about it is described under the places where evidence falls apart. What exactly counts as sufficient substantiation for a determination like this is described under the question of what counts as evidence for an obligation.
Determining the sector, substantiating that determination and keeping it current are tasks that must be carried out, with an owner, a source and a moment of reassessment. That is exactly the kind of task for which it can be determined which part is repeatable and which part requires judgment that cannot be automated. The work scan from FTE TO AI calculates per task which part of the work can be taken over by AI, and can be applied in the same way to determining and keeping current a sector classification.
Vraag maar welke verplichting op u van toepassing is, en waaraan u dat kunt aantonen.
Answers come from this site’s knowledge base. Not tailored advice, and not a scan of your company.